Disturbing thought, do the utility-based tokens have to keep going down in order to bring about more mass adoption of cryptocurrency?

I just had this realization while replying to another thread, the purpose of true commerce should be the the acquisition of the most product for the least amount of value. For utility coins this can present a problem, as they can represent payments for a service to be rendered. The problem is, if the value of them is going up, the cost for the service is getting more expensive. So why would people want to utilize coins that are continually going up in value when they are better as a store of value than their intended utility?

submitted by /u/A_Stones_throw
[link] [comments]

Read More

Popular posts from this blog

World Economic Forum Bitcoin Discussions Validate the Movement

The World Economic Forum WEF has long been a lightning rod of global discussion on economic, social and political trends. This years gathering in Davos, Switzerland, was no exception.Blockchain technology emerged center stage last week as a key discussion theme, receiving praise from attendees for its cutting-edge potential. Bitcoin and the future of cryptocurrencies, too, were highly discussed topics at the forum, not just casually but also in an official session and a few panel discussions.
Read more